I attempt to state my assumptions clearly, as to not state them, and to slide them by people, is the essential method of propaganda and PR... And I don't approve of that...
I consider it worth stating my basic philosophical stance (belief) which is that there is a ubiquitous (common) sourcemanifestation(1) of quality and harmony that is 'non-dual', this is not a linguistic or any other type of construction, this is our natural source of being. language struggles to deal with that signified by 'the term non dual' as the Taoists (Lao Tzu) and some Buddhists note, based as language is on the conceptual boundary. Those philosophies that place language first tend to emphasise the boundary, comparison and exclusion above the inclusive, that I believe is a mistake.
Ways beyond this imposed exclusive boundary include exploring random flows and techniques of synthesis as in spiral art.
Ways beyond this imposed exclusive boundary include exploring random flows and techniques of synthesis as in spiral art.